24 June 2013

Rights of Freedom - Part I - How they became a joke - My 5 points

Every democracy in the western world has a constitution and within there is - as the most sacred thing - a list of Freedom Rights.

These Rights of Freedom have for 200 years functioned to keep the government away from lots of aspects of the citizens life and have secured a lifestyle where everybody can enjoy the way he or she thinks a good life should be.

That impliment that I have to tolerate that my neighbor is living in a totally different way than I am - unless of course his or mine lifestyle include something criminal.

This is the basic of the western lifestyle that has generally given us the good life and every invention in the pursuit of happyness.

However the 21th century is different, the Rights of Freedom are falling apart and a lot of citizens are getting very frustrated about this.

How did it happend that the Rights of Freedom became a joke?

1. THE GOVERNMENTS in the western world BECAME BIGGER AND BIGGER. When you have small governments concentrating on the few things absolutely necessary for the citizens things are and were fine. Freedom works. But slowly and seemingly unstoppable these governments grew and grew and made the Rights of Freedom fade for every law they passed.

The intentions were always the best. Making a safer and better world for all of us by forbidden this and that and impose this and that. But the only sure result was slowly but surely taking away everybodys right to make up his way of the good life.

2. THE POLITICAL CORRECT ELITE CAME INTO POWER. This group of people was once known as marxist, communist and so on. And that way they never came into power. But disguised as do-gooders they entered every political party with the fundamental belief that it was possible to - by the means of the law - to make a better life for all. And laws we got. Tons of them. I dont think you can find a directive of less than 100 pages from the EU. And they are written in a language unspeakable for most people and read by very very few. Thereby creating bureaucracy in a scale the world has never seen before burdening the taxpayers unprecedented.

3. THE CONCEPT OF GOVERNMENT WAS THE BEST TO SOLVE EVERY PROBLEM IMAGINABLE BECAME DOMINANT. The marxist didnt achieve this by preaching their real goal. State ownership and equal misery for all. No they achieved it by putting the voters on addictions. Handing out small goodies to everyone so the generel population didnt see the bigger and biggers flaws in their sovjet-style survaillance-sociaty, their megabig bureaucracy with priviliges for the political class in unprecedent levels. The voters became addicted to these goodies and liked the idea that the government solved every problem imaginable even though it was a lie and even though they knew it was a lie but it was so nice to listen to.

4. Sound logic was now at risk and were discredited in less and less concealed ways. You shouldnt think that the people and wise politicians would allow this to happen but they did. Because the media was by now heavily influencing the political agenda and the media was heavily populated with do-gooders so the DO-GOODERS could SET THE AGENDA. Thereby common sense people were now a threat to this new form of stability where the governments were more important than the life of its citizens.


5. GOOD PEOPLE DID NOTHING. Jefferson: "The only thing it takes for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing." We took 20 tax-hikes and said nothing. We took 1000 new behavouristic laws and said nothing. We bought the newspapers even though the agenda became more and more clear and we said nothing. We accepted survaillance in an unprecedented scale in the name of fighting terror and we said nothing.

Luckely so many people are now so fed up with this political correct marxist elite that a european and american spring must be on the way - very soon.


If you want inspiration on this read my next blog: Rights of Freedom - part II - 5 points to fight back and win over the political correct elite.


17 June 2013

The 10 Biggest Failures of Communism

The European Youth has no memory of the failures of communism, and when +10% of danish voters seem inclined to vote for communism, it is appropriate to refresh the content of communism.

Communism is apparently a happy utopia where everyone has equal amount of wealth and everything is good BUT:


1. In a communist society, the first victim is DEMOCRACY since communism can not work if a narrow majority suddenly had to choose to leave communism. Hardcore Communists may argue that they are in favor of democracy, but 100 years of experience shows that democracy is the first victim of a communist society.

2. In a communist society operated only with the lower elements of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, with self-realisation reduced to altruism /presents to society, since no one can get more than others by doing an effort. Eventually all the goods in any shops will look more and more GRAY AND UNIFORM.

3. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION is severely affected by communism. Since communism can not afford democracy or other subversive acts, communism will eventually hit harder and harder down on dissidents and dissenters. Typically, communism used forced labor or the death penalty or imprisonment indefinitely.

4. OWNERSHIP disappears (maybe you can own your own toothbrush) NOT, but is transferred to the state. All human experience shows that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. There will thus be a new elite passed by party bosses that enjoys the few remaining luxuries. The 10% of Denmark's population today would vote for the Communist Party (Enhedslisten) is not among these megatycoons as a non-democratic country can be controlled with very few in the privileged class.

5. THE RULE OF LAW ceases to function. Judges must necessarily throw out all previous case law in a communist society, as the precedent was based on the right to property and other rights. The new communist law will favour the state in unprecedented proportions, as the lack of democracy and thus the lack of separation of powers does that the judges have only one power to relate to. (And would do well to remember it)

6. The ECONOMY IS SLOWED TO A HALT. You work by now only under the threat of jail or labour camp, the man without a job will earn just as well as you.

7. SURVEILLANCE SOCIETY will see unseen dimensions. Since the communist society requires total submission we will quickly develop a community where all spies on all for even the smallest offenses. Confidence in the neighbour disappears and only the closest family continue to speak openly and honestly with each other.

8 .The BORDERS ARE CLOSED. It is a natural consequence of the impossibility of self-realization and the closing down of freedom of expression that people wants to go. Only very obedient party people are allowed to travel.

9. CENSORSHIP IS A MEGABIG BUSINESS. Since no one may speak negatively about communism there will be plenty of jobs for censorship people monitoring newspapers, books, the internet, etc. (EU has made a new institute for surveillance - also against bloggers)
http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/media_taskforce/doc/pluralism/hlg/hlg_final_report.pdf

10. JOY OF LIFE DISAPPEAR. In a communist society where freedom of expression, democracy and self-realization is denied the discouragement tone spreads like a basille like wildfire to the entire population.




It has been tried. It was called the SovjetUnion. It collapsed in 1991.

#EU is walking down that road too. Read more here: http://xrepublic.tv/node/1232

The aspect of the massmurdering in the name of communism is another way to look at communism. It is estimated that about 100 million have been murdered in the name of communism: http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4230/so_how_many_did_communism_kill#.Uk_9CEKLHko.twitter

9 June 2013

How we win "the war" against Islam. 7 crusial points about the enemy from within

The West won the cold war against communism. In my view the winner was Ronald Reagan and we owe him a lot. He bankrupt Sovjet and won spiritually.

But now the West faces a totally different war. The enemy from within. The Jihad. The Sharia. The Islam.

The Islam is no ordinary religion. Its a regime of terror with deathpenalty for dropping out. 

We have been used to be so kind and think that love really conqours all. So our love has been greatly shining over immigrants for the last 20 years. That is - if love is money for free.

The West does not have a plan at this moment to win this new war. A war of a kind we have never seen before. Much has been spoken about all the troubles we import and how we should regain control of our borders. Both in the USA and in Europe. 

But very little has been spoken about how we win this war. 

So here I go with 7 crusial points to know if we want to win this war.  

1. BORDERCONTROL. Yes that is crusial to control your own borders. But thats just a starting point. 

2. CITIZENSHIP. Its here the real fight begins. You dont just hand out for free what is most dear to you. Futhermore. Votingrights is crusial for forming the West. We need to find a new pride in being a citizen. And by that I mean becoming a citizen should be difficult and should be celebrated as something very unique. In Europe that means we have to let go of the Marxist Frankfurtschools ruling body the ECHR in Strassbourg. Their rulings undermine everything the nationstates people died for. 

3. CONTROL OVER THE WELFARESTATE. If we continue granting everything from the big welfarestates of the West for free to every new immgrant we will for sure be overrun and loose this new war. We must understand that the welfarestate is build by hardworking people paying way to much in tax. So for respect of our own system you need to be a part of the tax-system and be a citizen before this magntude of services are giving to you for free. The alternative is the collapse of the welfarestate (or even riots in southern Europe). 

4. CONTROLLED IMMIGRATION. Every nationstate in the west must have a plan for how much immigration is suitable. In theory like the idea behind the US green card system (which is not working). If you dont control immigration you slowly but surely leave your own population your own people behind and give all the grants to a new class of welfaremigrants. The religion of Islam has several clerics who preaches being on welfare to prepare for Jihad. We need to grow up and face this reality. 

5. LOWERING TAXES. Welfarestates on diets. If we dont wanna say goodbye to the West we need to lower taxes. Not just in Scandinavia where the madness is worst but all over the West, so that working actually pays off and pride in earnng your daily bread is restored. 

6. BEING TOUGH. For the love of God we must grow up and take pride in who we are and be tough in negotiations around the world. 3rdWorldMoney is not the way to help poor people. It just keeps tyrants in place. We give allowances to our own kids for 5 maybe 10 years but then they have to earn their own money. 3rdWordMoney is the key corruptionsfactor in the world and we need to stop that. Single persons wanting to make a difference does make a difference. But statemoney has no enthusiasm no goal no drive.

7. TAKE A STAND AGAINST MOSQUE-BUILDINGS IN YOUR COUNTRY. They are not churches for another religion. They are the center of Jihad. The center of Sharia. And they are political opposed to everything the west stands for.

Update: Bill Warner "An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam" http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-10/

6 May 2013

13 arguments against feminism

Had the plessure of arguing with a danish feminist living in London today.

So here are 13 arguments against feminism:


1. Feminism is not an economic force in itself so by any standard feminism drives up taxes. 

2. The most important agenda of feminism is not making a better world, but getting more privileges to women. 

3. Western societies have taken more than 1000 years building what we have today. Feminism has no respect for that and is ready to break that down any day just to put another pin in their template. 

4. Feminism is a strong believer in behavourism. If you smoke, drink or in any other way do something not good for the society feminism will come for you and penalize you. 

5. Feminism does not tolerate thinking that is not conform with feminism. Such thoughts will be mentioned as rightwing or populism. 

6. Everything not entirely financed by the state will certainly by feminism be populism. 

7. Feminism is the main driver in the fascism of equality. Feminism did start out as a pure good thing, but has long ago reached a level of equality where sheer fascism is the driver.

8. Feminism is a strong believer in both European Union and The European Human Rights Court because feminism is contributing so little to real production that it needs institutions to say that it is the best. 
(Ordinary people does not rely on institutions to have selfesteem.)

9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgU2LEPdpMc

10. Feminism is very much in bed with Political Correctness. The meaning of this is disputed, but PC is at best a form of control on society, where normal people must accept certain rules to survive. 

11. Feminism makes men unsure about if it is okey to be a man and feel like a man. 

12. Feminism is only viable through stateregulation. Because no society would waste that much energy for non-productive special interest without a gun un its head. 

13. Without statesupport feminism would have been a hippie-fun thing.

Now as state-sponsered. We  all must abide to this nonsense.

Making us all poorer.


- And then there is Swedish feminism which is a chapter for itself. Way more hardcore.

- And then again I didnt even mention that the official state report in Denmark says that every woman born is a liability by 2,4m dkr (boys do the paying) Page 382 here: http://www.dreammodel.dk/pdf/R2004_01.pdf

- Best essay written against feminism: http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2010/10/09/barbara-kay-writes-the-best-essay-against-feminism-ever-written/

- If feminism really was a positive force they would not be silent about the way the muslim world treats women: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2424073/Why-fellow-feminists-shamefully-silent-tyranny-veil-asks-JULIE-BINDEL.html

+9000 readers for this article.
My wish is not mocking but to make people able to ARGUE.

29 April 2013

The 7 sickness' of Danish economy

+15% of the public budget of Denmark goes to things not benefitting danish taxpayers!

Remember to click just 1 add then I will be able to continue.


1. FreeImmigration
This is hopefully a hot topic. Many studies shows that the free immigration to Denmark cost at least 15 bill dkr a YEAR and maybe as much as 50 bill dkr. a year. 3worldimmigration is only problem in every study. 50 bill. dkr.


2. Bureaucracy
In Denmark we have abt 825.000 public employed compared to abt 450.000 in Switzerland with abt the same population. We have a lot of good things though. But at least 50.000 or maybe 100.000 are bureaucrats creating rules or orbeying rules nobody wants. 20 bill drk.
Upon that every public employed in Denmark has a payed lunchbreak. Who pays that? This alone cost danish taxpayers abt 15 bill dkr.
Buraeucracy 35-40 bill dkr.

3. 3rdWorldMoney
Current socialst government has increased 3rdworld-payment to 16½ bill. dkr. a year. Even though  studies http://videnskab.dk/kultur-samfund/ulandsbistand-oger-skellet-mellem-rig-og-fattig shows that all this statemoney heavyly ends at the wrong ends. Like taking money from the poor people in the rich countries and giving it to the rich people in the poor countries. 16½ bill dkr.

4. GreenLie
Denmark uses far most - not only on 3rdworldmoney - but also on GreenEnergi. That means that if your company needs energy = STAY AWAY FROM DENMARK. We have redicoulous high energy prices. More than 3 times real prices. Extra tax is what it is. Unless humanrace really is able to control the stars. Im not that stupid. +15 bill dkr.

5. EU
With Helle Thorning Schmidts latest deal with EU danish netcontribution is up abt 2 bill. dkr. or around 12 bill. dkr. a YEAR. No country in eu has a higher netcontribution pr citizen than Denmark. 12 bill dkr.

6. Greenland
Why Denmark just cash a check of 5 bill dkr. a year to Greenland blows my mind. They dont even want to be part of Denmark. 5 bill dkr.

7. Danmarks Radio/StateTelevision
This very red public radio/tv channel is showing everything in a very red perspective. And very little real public needed information. 4,5 bill dkr.

So +15% of the national budget of Denmark goes to things not at all doing anything good to the danish people.

4 February 2013

Identities: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

The European Union has for years tried to make you understand, that having a national identity is ugly.

You need to be a "European by heart" as the danish prime minister told she was to the EU-parlament.

But that makes me ask: Why? Why is european identity good and national identity ugly? Why not go a step futher and say that a global identity is good and a european identity bad?

Its all about power. To crush the national identity is only for the PC elite of Europe to get more power. Any logic behind that european identity is good and national identity ugly is simply not there.

We the people needs to remember this in our fight to dismantle this EU-monster.

This years budget from EU will include about 3 mill. euros to monitor any euroscepticism on social medias including this blog. Why?

Not to be more understanding to what people in Europe want but to crush us who dare to speak up against the EU-monster.

The resemblence to the former USSR is getting larger and larger. Be bold speak up. I will.

The Troll-watcher-budget-article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/9845442/EU-to-set-up-euro-election-troll-patrol-to-tackle-Eurosceptic-surge.html

Derfor blev jeg blokeret på 180grader.dk!

Redaktionen på 180gader.dk blokerede mig i sidste uge.

I modsætning til andre sociale medier bliver man ikke på sitet eller via mail orienteret om årsagen.

Jeg gætter imidlertid - med nogen vægt - på at følgende var årsag til min blokering:

I protest mod oprettelsen af "kattebakken" lod jeg mine seneste 3-4 indlæg slutte med følgende:

Fremover slutter alle mine indlæg med et forbudt ord (fx muslim) i protest mod at Danmarks største problem - uhæmmet indvandring - her på sitet skal underkues (ikke se, ikke høre, ikke tale)

Dermed blev jeg en torn i øjet på den nye form for politisk korrekthed der har indfundet sig på 180grader.dk.

Danmarks 1. brugerstyrede avis er nu fortid. Ikke alene blokeres for at have en anden holdning end udgiver, men hele debatten om masseindvandringen, der puttes væk fra overblikket og helst ikke skal ses viser alt om, hvor meget LA og 180grader.dk er en del af det politiske korrekte Danmark og hvor lille afstanden er mellem LA og vanvidspartiet De Radikale Venstre.

Jeg klarer mig uden.