16 November 2013

Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime

According to one of the most senior danish scientists - Peter Gøtzsche - psykofarmika pills kills +200.000 a year.

Listen here to Wake Up from your pills:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1LQiow_ZIQ

"To give insulin to a diabetic" is a myth trying to help to sell these psykofarmika-pills

HELP me stop this madness industri! 

26 October 2013

Global Warming? A chili update

There has been a lot of publicity regarding IPCCs new propaganda in september.

Now we in the northern homosphere is getting close to winter, with more ice on the NorthPole as usual. We can expect another cold winter.

And now this news comes in. Chile hit with worst cold spell in 80 years. 

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/26/global-warming-chile-hit-with-worst-cold-spell-in-80-years/#ixzz2irmpphLy




The problems with the IPCC are 2 things. 

The sience is very questionable at best. 

The money spend on this madness is beyond madness. 

You could solve the combined list from the Copenhagen Consensus with that kind of money. Or alternative. We could have been spared the debtcrisis. 

Stand up against the do-gooders. 

They are only do-gooders as long as they can spend your money on exstravagance on them self, while they pretent to be do-gooders. 



4 October 2013

Global persecution of Christians - Most untold story this century!

How can MSM just report attack after attack and not see and not report how things fit together?

this is from the spectator:

"According to the International Society for Human Rights, a secular observatory based in Frankfurt, Germany, 80 per cent of all acts of religious discrimination in the world today are directed at Christians. Statistically speaking, that makes Christians by far the most persecuted religious body on the planet.

Imagine if correspondents in late 1944 had reported the Battle of the Bulge, but without explaining that it was a turning point in the second world war. Or what if finance reporters had told the story of the AIG meltdown in 2008 without adding that it raised questions about derivatives and sub-prime mortgages that could augur a vast financial implosion?

Most people would say that journalists had failed to provide the proper context to understand the news. Yet that’s routinely what media outlets do when it comes to outbreaks of anti-Christian persecution around the world, which is why the global war on Christians remains the greatest story never told of the early 21st century."

19 September 2013

10 Month in Jail for Throwing Bacon at a Mosque

I never stop being amazed of the terrible destructive force of PoliticalCorrectness.

They are so afraid of islam that we just could hand over the remaining christian countries in the world.

But we wont. Their is still time to realise this madness and oppose it.

This time madness occured in Edingbough

From the BBC-news:

"A man who threw bacon into an Edinburgh mosque has been jailed for 10 months.
Wayne Stilwell, 25, was caught on security cameras attaching the bacon to the handles of the main door at Edinburgh's Central Mosque.
He then threw the bacon inside the building, knowing Muslims regard pork as unclean.
At Edinburgh Sheriff Court earlier he pled guilty to causing a breach of the peace. His lawyer said Stilwell was sorry for his crime.
Sheriff Gordon Liddle said his actions had been "grossly offensive" and jailed him for 10 months.
Sheriff Liddle said: "A custodial sentence is inevitable."

14 September 2013

The EU Commission - Everything you dont want

Friday the 13th is usually an unlucky day. No exception this september.

The European Union who for 17 years have had their accounting denounced by its own accounters now wants to silence them.

This EU is no good for any european. To silence rightfull criticism is everything but worthy of a democracy.

Read more here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10306461/EU-auditors-must-tone-down-criticism-of-Brussels-spending-says-Herman-Van-Rompuy.html

8 September 2013

Top 10 Reasons for No War With Syria

1. The West will with 85% certainty bring the likes of Al Qaeda to power in Syria if we bring down Assad.

2. Syria is in a civil war with lots of foreign jihadists involved. There is no senario, where the West will have a more democratic and better Syria, if we go to war with Assad.

3. Syria is so divided into a multietnic and multireligious mixture, that more war will certainly bring more dispair to more syrian people.

4. If the West (or just USA) attack Assad we will with garantee kill a lot of innocent people.

5. We will most certainly create huge outflows of refugees, which our leaders will tell us we now - because of the war - are morally obliged to give refuge in our countries.

6. If there is any dangerous weapons in Syria we will leave them unprotected in the hands of random people - but most likely the Al Nusra Al Qaeda troops.

7. Christians and jews will be the first and most hard hit victims of an intervention by the West.

8. Economicly a war with Syria will prolong the economic crisis in the world, with higher oil-prices, less growth and more dispair worldwide as a result.

9. China and Russia will have even more reasons to look at the West as imperialistic and oldfashioned.

10. Oh, the evidence of Assad using chemical weapons? Dont fall for that, It could be the rebels, it could be Assad, but the strong powers in the West can make these evidence look convinsing. Dont fall for it. History has showed us that it takes at least 50-60 years before they admit covert ops. And frankly I dont care who did what, because the West has nothing to do in this civil war.

Read more arguments here: http://original.antiwar.com/jwhitehead/2013/09/05/ten-reasons-why-america-does-not-need-to-go-to-war-over-syria/

2 September 2013

29 August 2013

The MassImmigration to Sweden continues

Last week a new record for welfaremigrants was made: 1393 in 1 week!

In a few years the Sweden you knew will not be the same

https://twitter.com/migga_x/status/371945574054264832/photo/1

25 August 2013

Who will Gain on a Syria-intervention?

The rhetoric on the situation in Syria this week tightened. The risk that Nato will to war again is increasing.

Therefore, it is relevant to look into the interest groups that stands to gain on such a war.

"Follow the money"-like.

Firstly, we have, as always, the military-industrial complex. These companies always like to have war, of course. New types of weapons - including drones - cant be sold before they have proven their worth in a real war. And you must never underestimate the importance of their money in (mainly) Washington.

Secondly, there are the banks to finance the war. No states currently have money to finance war, so states have to borrow. And in war, interest rates are always extra good, the work (the war) must of course be completed.

Thirdly, we have the group of politicians in power in Europe and the U.S., who has torn economies apart.

A brisk foreign policy matter of great importance removes unpleasant focus on domestic problems, which unfortunately has been the default behavior in the U.S. for decades. This behavior is now also gaining a major foothold in Europe.

Fourthly, we have the parties in Syria itself. Will NATO intervention result in fewer deaths? I think NO. Will NATO intervention result in fewer refugees? NOT likely. Will NATO intervention remove the dictator Assad? For sure. The rebels will come to power. These fragmented groups can be divided into very many subgroups, the two most relevant are:
The Western-backed democratic rebels (small groups which will soon be eliminated as we saw in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt)
The fundamentalist Sunni Muslims are the clear majority by rebels and will thus be able to topple the Assad regime. I garantee you that this regime-shift will not bring Syria any further in democracy and human rights matters.

The West has no interest in getting involved in this religious war between Shia and Sunni Muslims, but still politicians louder and louder shouts war.

Now you know why.

21 August 2013

5 things Civil Servants Care about

Small Government is a hard thing to get.

Civil Servants Care about these Things:

1. Getting a good and higher and higher salary.

2. Making their job look important in the eyes of the civil servant above them.

3. Getting good benefits for themself.

4. Hiring friends.

5. Doing Less For More.

Tame that monster he who dares!

19 July 2013

For the good of all mankind

There is nothing normal these days.

Debt is booming. Migration is booming. Entitlements are booming.

All this booming is made in the name of being good and doing good.

So what went wrong? And where do we have to start to repair the systems?

First of all we need to have a passion for balance.

Balanced budget should be the 1th admentment in every state. We cant wake Keynes up from the dead and make him personally clean up all the mess his overspending ideas have created.

Migration is not solving any problems. Its nice to travel but its even nicer to have a home. Right now migration is about to denying the multitude of european different people a homeland. These days a white christian swede or german person has to live in countries where immigration is so big that hallal is the name of the game, crime is at rates never seen before, and unsecurity is ramping.

Migration to Europe is not only caused by trouble somewhere else. Its caused primarely by entitlements.

When people in a troubled country gets to know that in european countries they can get entitlements 10 times a good wage in their own country of course they are comming in hordes. This is not helping the greater good of all mankind.

Migration to Europe is causing inactivity, entitlements explosions and lots of etnic and religious conflicts.

The only way forward for Europe is to grow a spine and do the following:

1. Make migration everything but a walk in the park. If you dont dare beeing tough you are part of the problem.

2. Big overhaul on entitlements. Most european countries are up to their neck in debt caused by entitlements-programs. Making people doing nothing for getting it and making more harm than good.

3. Big overhaul on tax-system. Most european countries have a taxrate over 40%. Lots of hard working people have experienced a final taxpayment of way over 60%. This is draining initiative. Putting Europe to a hault.

7 July 2013

Rights of Freedom - part II - 5 points to fight back and win over the political correct elite

Surveillance-society
Tax and hand-outs-society


Freedom Rights are very much under pressure.

So what to do, what can be the plan to win Freedom Rights back?

Here is my plan:

1. EXPOSE THE BIGSTATESYNDROM. Use Twitter, blogs, facebook whatever. Make more and more people realize that BigState is NOT the solution but the problem. This is hard work but worth while.

2. VOTE LIBERTY. Believing in democracy may be cracy but the alternative better is not there.

3. USE YOUR NETWORK. Family, friends, colleges and clubmembers. Make them understand that we are in serius time where collapses of states are imminent. This is the most important thing. Network and make your way known. Compare to the collapse of Rome. We are there with Obama.

4. TAKE EVERY GRANT FROM THE STATE YOU CAN. Entitlements are what bring the western states down. Take them. Dont be ashamed. If only women and muslims takes the grants you can work the sun black and not change a thing.

5. MAKE YOUR ECONOMY RESILIANT TO ECONOMIC BREAKDOWN. Lots of sites and persons offers advices to your economy - also about the comming collapse of the economies of the western states - EU and USA - Be carefull. Dont just buy gold or anything. Put your money where your heart is will never fail. Do it.

If you follow these 5 easy steps either the politiciens will mature and make prudent laws or the current states will collapse and new freedoms will evolve thereafter.

Alternative way to get freedomrights back:
 http://freedomain.blogspot.dk/2005/01/loving-state-leviathan-and-optimism.html
 (pay as much as you can to the monster the sooner the collapse will come)




24 June 2013

Rights of Freedom - Part I - How they became a joke - My 5 points

Every democracy in the western world has a constitution and within there is - as the most sacred thing - a list of Freedom Rights.

These Rights of Freedom have for 200 years functioned to keep the government away from lots of aspects of the citizens life and have secured a lifestyle where everybody can enjoy the way he or she thinks a good life should be.

That impliment that I have to tolerate that my neighbor is living in a totally different way than I am - unless of course his or mine lifestyle include something criminal.

This is the basic of the western lifestyle that has generally given us the good life and every invention in the pursuit of happyness.

However the 21th century is different, the Rights of Freedom are falling apart and a lot of citizens are getting very frustrated about this.

How did it happend that the Rights of Freedom became a joke?

1. THE GOVERNMENTS in the western world BECAME BIGGER AND BIGGER. When you have small governments concentrating on the few things absolutely necessary for the citizens things are and were fine. Freedom works. But slowly and seemingly unstoppable these governments grew and grew and made the Rights of Freedom fade for every law they passed.

The intentions were always the best. Making a safer and better world for all of us by forbidden this and that and impose this and that. But the only sure result was slowly but surely taking away everybodys right to make up his way of the good life.

2. THE POLITICAL CORRECT ELITE CAME INTO POWER. This group of people was once known as marxist, communist and so on. And that way they never came into power. But disguised as do-gooders they entered every political party with the fundamental belief that it was possible to - by the means of the law - to make a better life for all. And laws we got. Tons of them. I dont think you can find a directive of less than 100 pages from the EU. And they are written in a language unspeakable for most people and read by very very few. Thereby creating bureaucracy in a scale the world has never seen before burdening the taxpayers unprecedented.

3. THE CONCEPT OF GOVERNMENT WAS THE BEST TO SOLVE EVERY PROBLEM IMAGINABLE BECAME DOMINANT. The marxist didnt achieve this by preaching their real goal. State ownership and equal misery for all. No they achieved it by putting the voters on addictions. Handing out small goodies to everyone so the generel population didnt see the bigger and biggers flaws in their sovjet-style survaillance-sociaty, their megabig bureaucracy with priviliges for the political class in unprecedent levels. The voters became addicted to these goodies and liked the idea that the government solved every problem imaginable even though it was a lie and even though they knew it was a lie but it was so nice to listen to.

4. Sound logic was now at risk and were discredited in less and less concealed ways. You shouldnt think that the people and wise politicians would allow this to happen but they did. Because the media was by now heavily influencing the political agenda and the media was heavily populated with do-gooders so the DO-GOODERS could SET THE AGENDA. Thereby common sense people were now a threat to this new form of stability where the governments were more important than the life of its citizens.


5. GOOD PEOPLE DID NOTHING. Jefferson: "The only thing it takes for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing." We took 20 tax-hikes and said nothing. We took 1000 new behavouristic laws and said nothing. We bought the newspapers even though the agenda became more and more clear and we said nothing. We accepted survaillance in an unprecedented scale in the name of fighting terror and we said nothing.

Luckely so many people are now so fed up with this political correct marxist elite that a european and american spring must be on the way - very soon.


If you want inspiration on this read my next blog: Rights of Freedom - part II - 5 points to fight back and win over the political correct elite.


17 June 2013

The 10 Biggest Failures of Communism

The European Youth has no memory of the failures of communism, and when +10% of danish voters seem inclined to vote for communism, it is appropriate to refresh the content of communism.

Communism is apparently a happy utopia where everyone has equal amount of wealth and everything is good BUT:


1. In a communist society, the first victim is DEMOCRACY since communism can not work if a narrow majority suddenly had to choose to leave communism. Hardcore Communists may argue that they are in favor of democracy, but 100 years of experience shows that democracy is the first victim of a communist society.

2. In a communist society operated only with the lower elements of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, with self-realisation reduced to altruism /presents to society, since no one can get more than others by doing an effort. Eventually all the goods in any shops will look more and more GRAY AND UNIFORM.

3. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION is severely affected by communism. Since communism can not afford democracy or other subversive acts, communism will eventually hit harder and harder down on dissidents and dissenters. Typically, communism used forced labor or the death penalty or imprisonment indefinitely.

4. OWNERSHIP disappears (maybe you can own your own toothbrush) NOT, but is transferred to the state. All human experience shows that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. There will thus be a new elite passed by party bosses that enjoys the few remaining luxuries. The 10% of Denmark's population today would vote for the Communist Party (Enhedslisten) is not among these megatycoons as a non-democratic country can be controlled with very few in the privileged class.

5. THE RULE OF LAW ceases to function. Judges must necessarily throw out all previous case law in a communist society, as the precedent was based on the right to property and other rights. The new communist law will favour the state in unprecedented proportions, as the lack of democracy and thus the lack of separation of powers does that the judges have only one power to relate to. (And would do well to remember it)

6. The ECONOMY IS SLOWED TO A HALT. You work by now only under the threat of jail or labour camp, the man without a job will earn just as well as you.

7. SURVEILLANCE SOCIETY will see unseen dimensions. Since the communist society requires total submission we will quickly develop a community where all spies on all for even the smallest offenses. Confidence in the neighbour disappears and only the closest family continue to speak openly and honestly with each other.

8 .The BORDERS ARE CLOSED. It is a natural consequence of the impossibility of self-realization and the closing down of freedom of expression that people wants to go. Only very obedient party people are allowed to travel.

9. CENSORSHIP IS A MEGABIG BUSINESS. Since no one may speak negatively about communism there will be plenty of jobs for censorship people monitoring newspapers, books, the internet, etc. (EU has made a new institute for surveillance - also against bloggers)
http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/media_taskforce/doc/pluralism/hlg/hlg_final_report.pdf

10. JOY OF LIFE DISAPPEAR. In a communist society where freedom of expression, democracy and self-realization is denied the discouragement tone spreads like a basille like wildfire to the entire population.




It has been tried. It was called the SovjetUnion. It collapsed in 1991.

#EU is walking down that road too. Read more here: http://xrepublic.tv/node/1232

The aspect of the massmurdering in the name of communism is another way to look at communism. It is estimated that about 100 million have been murdered in the name of communism: http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4230/so_how_many_did_communism_kill#.Uk_9CEKLHko.twitter

9 June 2013

How we win "the war" against Islam. 7 crusial points about the enemy from within

The West won the cold war against communism. In my view the winner was Ronald Reagan and we owe him a lot. He bankrupt Sovjet and won spiritually.

But now the West faces a totally different war. The enemy from within. The Jihad. The Sharia. The Islam.

The Islam is no ordinary religion. Its a regime of terror with deathpenalty for dropping out. 

We have been used to be so kind and think that love really conqours all. So our love has been greatly shining over immigrants for the last 20 years. That is - if love is money for free.

The West does not have a plan at this moment to win this new war. A war of a kind we have never seen before. Much has been spoken about all the troubles we import and how we should regain control of our borders. Both in the USA and in Europe. 

But very little has been spoken about how we win this war. 

So here I go with 7 crusial points to know if we want to win this war.  

1. BORDERCONTROL. Yes that is crusial to control your own borders. But thats just a starting point. 

2. CITIZENSHIP. Its here the real fight begins. You dont just hand out for free what is most dear to you. Futhermore. Votingrights is crusial for forming the West. We need to find a new pride in being a citizen. And by that I mean becoming a citizen should be difficult and should be celebrated as something very unique. In Europe that means we have to let go of the Marxist Frankfurtschools ruling body the ECHR in Strassbourg. Their rulings undermine everything the nationstates people died for. 

3. CONTROL OVER THE WELFARESTATE. If we continue granting everything from the big welfarestates of the West for free to every new immgrant we will for sure be overrun and loose this new war. We must understand that the welfarestate is build by hardworking people paying way to much in tax. So for respect of our own system you need to be a part of the tax-system and be a citizen before this magntude of services are giving to you for free. The alternative is the collapse of the welfarestate (or even riots in southern Europe). 

4. CONTROLLED IMMIGRATION. Every nationstate in the west must have a plan for how much immigration is suitable. In theory like the idea behind the US green card system (which is not working). If you dont control immigration you slowly but surely leave your own population your own people behind and give all the grants to a new class of welfaremigrants. The religion of Islam has several clerics who preaches being on welfare to prepare for Jihad. We need to grow up and face this reality. 

5. LOWERING TAXES. Welfarestates on diets. If we dont wanna say goodbye to the West we need to lower taxes. Not just in Scandinavia where the madness is worst but all over the West, so that working actually pays off and pride in earnng your daily bread is restored. 

6. BEING TOUGH. For the love of God we must grow up and take pride in who we are and be tough in negotiations around the world. 3rdWorldMoney is not the way to help poor people. It just keeps tyrants in place. We give allowances to our own kids for 5 maybe 10 years but then they have to earn their own money. 3rdWordMoney is the key corruptionsfactor in the world and we need to stop that. Single persons wanting to make a difference does make a difference. But statemoney has no enthusiasm no goal no drive.

7. TAKE A STAND AGAINST MOSQUE-BUILDINGS IN YOUR COUNTRY. They are not churches for another religion. They are the center of Jihad. The center of Sharia. And they are political opposed to everything the west stands for.

Update: Bill Warner "An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam" http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-10/

6 May 2013

13 arguments against feminism

Had the plessure of arguing with a danish feminist living in London today.

So here are 13 arguments against feminism:


1. Feminism is not an economic force in itself so by any standard feminism drives up taxes. 

2. The most important agenda of feminism is not making a better world, but getting more privileges to women. 

3. Western societies have taken more than 1000 years building what we have today. Feminism has no respect for that and is ready to break that down any day just to put another pin in their template. 

4. Feminism is a strong believer in behavourism. If you smoke, drink or in any other way do something not good for the society feminism will come for you and penalize you. 

5. Feminism does not tolerate thinking that is not conform with feminism. Such thoughts will be mentioned as rightwing or populism. 

6. Everything not entirely financed by the state will certainly by feminism be populism. 

7. Feminism is the main driver in the fascism of equality. Feminism did start out as a pure good thing, but has long ago reached a level of equality where sheer fascism is the driver.

8. Feminism is a strong believer in both European Union and The European Human Rights Court because feminism is contributing so little to real production that it needs institutions to say that it is the best. 
(Ordinary people does not rely on institutions to have selfesteem.)

9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgU2LEPdpMc

10. Feminism is very much in bed with Political Correctness. The meaning of this is disputed, but PC is at best a form of control on society, where normal people must accept certain rules to survive. 

11. Feminism makes men unsure about if it is okey to be a man and feel like a man. 

12. Feminism is only viable through stateregulation. Because no society would waste that much energy for non-productive special interest without a gun un its head. 

13. Without statesupport feminism would have been a hippie-fun thing.

Now as state-sponsered. We  all must abide to this nonsense.

Making us all poorer.


- And then there is Swedish feminism which is a chapter for itself. Way more hardcore.

- And then again I didnt even mention that the official state report in Denmark says that every woman born is a liability by 2,4m dkr (boys do the paying) Page 382 here: http://www.dreammodel.dk/pdf/R2004_01.pdf

- Best essay written against feminism: http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2010/10/09/barbara-kay-writes-the-best-essay-against-feminism-ever-written/

- If feminism really was a positive force they would not be silent about the way the muslim world treats women: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2424073/Why-fellow-feminists-shamefully-silent-tyranny-veil-asks-JULIE-BINDEL.html

+9000 readers for this article.
My wish is not mocking but to make people able to ARGUE.

29 April 2013

The 7 sickness' of Danish economy

+15% of the public budget of Denmark goes to things not benefitting danish taxpayers!

Remember to click just 1 add then I will be able to continue.


1. FreeImmigration
This is hopefully a hot topic. Many studies shows that the free immigration to Denmark cost at least 15 bill dkr a YEAR and maybe as much as 50 bill dkr. a year. 3worldimmigration is only problem in every study. 50 bill. dkr.


2. Bureaucracy
In Denmark we have abt 825.000 public employed compared to abt 450.000 in Switzerland with abt the same population. We have a lot of good things though. But at least 50.000 or maybe 100.000 are bureaucrats creating rules or orbeying rules nobody wants. 20 bill drk.
Upon that every public employed in Denmark has a payed lunchbreak. Who pays that? This alone cost danish taxpayers abt 15 bill dkr.
Buraeucracy 35-40 bill dkr.

3. 3rdWorldMoney
Current socialst government has increased 3rdworld-payment to 16½ bill. dkr. a year. Even though  studies http://videnskab.dk/kultur-samfund/ulandsbistand-oger-skellet-mellem-rig-og-fattig shows that all this statemoney heavyly ends at the wrong ends. Like taking money from the poor people in the rich countries and giving it to the rich people in the poor countries. 16½ bill dkr.

4. GreenLie
Denmark uses far most - not only on 3rdworldmoney - but also on GreenEnergi. That means that if your company needs energy = STAY AWAY FROM DENMARK. We have redicoulous high energy prices. More than 3 times real prices. Extra tax is what it is. Unless humanrace really is able to control the stars. Im not that stupid. +15 bill dkr.

5. EU
With Helle Thorning Schmidts latest deal with EU danish netcontribution is up abt 2 bill. dkr. or around 12 bill. dkr. a YEAR. No country in eu has a higher netcontribution pr citizen than Denmark. 12 bill dkr.

6. Greenland
Why Denmark just cash a check of 5 bill dkr. a year to Greenland blows my mind. They dont even want to be part of Denmark. 5 bill dkr.

7. Danmarks Radio/StateTelevision
This very red public radio/tv channel is showing everything in a very red perspective. And very little real public needed information. 4,5 bill dkr.

So +15% of the national budget of Denmark goes to things not at all doing anything good to the danish people.

4 February 2013

Identities: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

The European Union has for years tried to make you understand, that having a national identity is ugly.

You need to be a "European by heart" as the danish prime minister told she was to the EU-parlament.

But that makes me ask: Why? Why is european identity good and national identity ugly? Why not go a step futher and say that a global identity is good and a european identity bad?

Its all about power. To crush the national identity is only for the PC elite of Europe to get more power. Any logic behind that european identity is good and national identity ugly is simply not there.

We the people needs to remember this in our fight to dismantle this EU-monster.

This years budget from EU will include about 3 mill. euros to monitor any euroscepticism on social medias including this blog. Why?

Not to be more understanding to what people in Europe want but to crush us who dare to speak up against the EU-monster.

The resemblence to the former USSR is getting larger and larger. Be bold speak up. I will.

The Troll-watcher-budget-article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/9845442/EU-to-set-up-euro-election-troll-patrol-to-tackle-Eurosceptic-surge.html

Derfor blev jeg blokeret på 180grader.dk!

Redaktionen på 180gader.dk blokerede mig i sidste uge.

I modsætning til andre sociale medier bliver man ikke på sitet eller via mail orienteret om årsagen.

Jeg gætter imidlertid - med nogen vægt - på at følgende var årsag til min blokering:

I protest mod oprettelsen af "kattebakken" lod jeg mine seneste 3-4 indlæg slutte med følgende:

Fremover slutter alle mine indlæg med et forbudt ord (fx muslim) i protest mod at Danmarks største problem - uhæmmet indvandring - her på sitet skal underkues (ikke se, ikke høre, ikke tale)

Dermed blev jeg en torn i øjet på den nye form for politisk korrekthed der har indfundet sig på 180grader.dk.

Danmarks 1. brugerstyrede avis er nu fortid. Ikke alene blokeres for at have en anden holdning end udgiver, men hele debatten om masseindvandringen, der puttes væk fra overblikket og helst ikke skal ses viser alt om, hvor meget LA og 180grader.dk er en del af det politiske korrekte Danmark og hvor lille afstanden er mellem LA og vanvidspartiet De Radikale Venstre.

Jeg klarer mig uden.

3 February 2013

Om udmeldelse af EU - sådan gør man


Skulle den lykkelige situation opstå at også danskerne får lov til - som briterne - at stemme om medlemskabet af EU, ja så kommer spørgsmålet – hvad sker der, hvis danskerne stemmer for en udmeldelse. Herom gælder der følgende:

At have indmeldt sig i EU, der i Rom-traktaten arbejder for ”et stadigt snævrere samarbejde” medfører betydelige juridiske problemer, jo længere man bliver i unionen, såfremt man en dag ønsker at udmelde sig. Men det lykkedes for Grønland i 1985, som eneste eksempel indtil videre så det kan lade sig gøre.

Før Lissabon-traktaten var der ingen bestemmelser i Unionens millioner af bestemmelser om udmeldelse. Dermed gjaldt den generelle Wienerkonvention om traktater, artikel 56.[i] Denne tillader udmeldelse, såfremt det var ideen med traktaten, at udmeldelse skulle kunne ske, men dette kan man vanskeligt sige om EU – før Lissabon-traktaten - igen under henvisning til Rom-traktatens forpligtelse på et stadigt snævrere samarbejde.

Dette er bl.a. slået fast i sagen Costa/Enel hvor EU-retten blev fastslået at være af vigtigere karakter end national lovgivning og overdragelsen af beføjelser var af permanent karakter.[ii]

Til trods for denne no-way-out-situation, lykkedes det som nævnt Grønland at trække sig i 1985.[iii]

Udmeldelse efter Lissabon-traktaten

Med Lissabon traktaten blev der indføjet en udmeldelsesprocedure i artikel 50. Uanset om man derfor ved en folkeafstemning forkaster traktaten, ja så eksisterer der nu for alle lande en gyldig udmeldelsesprocedure (som endda har rygdækning i Wienerkonventionen).

Fremover er der 2 muligheder for udmeldelse. Enten forhandler man sig til en aftale (den engelske vej?) eller også sender man simpelthen bare udmeldelsen. Udmeldelsesperioden er 2 år. 

I begge tilfælde vil der i henhold til artikel 50, stk 2 skulle forhandles[iv] om udmeldelsesbetingelser og fremtidige relation mellem EU og det udmeldende land.

EU traktaten siger det ikke direkte men EU i mange hastigheder er således fuldt ud traktat-funderet.[v]

Processen med udmeldelse minder – sjovt nok – ganske meget om processen med at optage nye medlemmer. Disse opnår en associeringsaftale via en traktat, præcis på samme måde som Grønland fik sin udmeldelsestraktat.

Lykkes man ikke at opnå enighed om en udmeldelsestraktat, hvilket må siges at være uhørt, ja så ophører medlemskabet blot og man må se sig om efter andre klubber at deltage i, såfremt man ønsker det. 

noter: 
[i] 1. A treaty which contains no provision regarding its termination and which does not provide for denunciation or withdrawal is not subject to denunciation or withdrawal unless:
a) it is established that the parties intended to admit the possibility of denunciation or withdrawal; or
b) a right of denunciation or withdrawal may be implied by the nature of the treaty. 
[ii] http://en.wikeipedia.org/wiki/Costa_v_ENEL
[iii] http://eu.nanoq.gl/Emner/EuGl/TheGreenlandTreaty.aspx
[iv]Article 50(2) In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliamen
[v] Lige så vel som et EU i mange hastigheder eksisterer i dag. EURO-landene, Shengen-landene, Tobin-11-landene samt et utal af protokol-undtagelser, hvor de 4 danske forbehold er mest kendte, men alle EU-lande har mindst en protokol-undtagelse (fx den danske sommerhusregel).

Du kan være med til at fremprovokere afstemningen her: http://www.skrivunder.net/helt_ud_nu

7 reasons for saying no to opinionpolls


1. We dont want politiciens, who dont mean anything by themself. 
2. We dont want to keep newspapers n career politiciens alive by telling them what to mean today.
3. We dont want politiciens who dont mean anything themself, but only speak after reading todays polls. 
4. We dont want politics to be a commecialised product which can be predicted, quantified n made a tool for an elite who dosnt care about you or what makes you.
5.If you dont answers opinionspolls you make the politiciens a bit scared for the public.
6. In old days it was nessesary to be able to hear the grass grow to be a politician. That is much needed today, when politics is just a career for opinions-speakers.
7. Opinonpolls gives politiciens a lot of excuses for not at all having a personal opinion. That is wrong. Make an end to that.  

På dansk: 
Rigtig mange danskere oplever opkald fra meningsmålingsfolk. Man kunne tro at det var vigtigt at påvirke disse ved troskyldigt at svare som spurgt, men du skal IKKE svare! Sig pænt nej tak, fordi:

1. Vi gider ikke politikere, der ikke mener noget selv. 
2. Du holder aviserne og levebrødspolitikerne i live, ved at fortælle dem hvorfor de skal mene noget nyt i dag. 
3. Du er skyld i at poltikere mere og mere ikke mener noget selv, men blot lytter til seneste måling.
4. Politik er for vigtigt til at blive kommercialiseret som en vare, der kan forudses, kvanteficeres og gøres til et værktøj for en elite, der ikke ønsker dig eller vil dig noget. 
5. Svarer du ikke, gør du politikerne en smule bange for hvad folket mener (og det er meningen og det er vigtigt.) 
6. At kunne høre græsset gro, var i gamle dage nødvendigt for at kunne blive politiker. Det skal vi have genskabt (ikke disse politikere, der bare siger, hvad dagens meningsmåling fordrer). 
7. Meningsmålinger giver politikerne masser af undskyldninger for ikke at selv at mene noget. Det duer simpelthen ikke. Gør noget aktivt for at stoppe dette. Læg røret på. 

Heldigvis er andelen der gider svare på meningsmålinger faldet fra 36% i 1997 til 9% i 2012 (USA-tal) http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/09/30/we-are-the-91-only-9-of-americans-cooperate-with-pollsters/ 

Kommunismens 10 største fejltagelser


Den europæiske ungdom har ingen erindring om kommunismens fejltagelser, og da +10% af danske vælgere tilsyneladende hælder til enhedslisten, er det relevant at genopfriske indholdet af disse. 

Kommunisme er tilsyneladende et lykkeligt utopia, hvor alle har lige megen velstand og alt er godt, MEN

1. I et kommunistisk samfund vil det første offer være demokratiet, idet kommunisme ikke kan fungere, hvis et knebent flertal pludselig måtte vælge at forlade kommunismen. Hardcore-kommunister vil måske indvende at de går ind for demokrati, men 100 års erfaring viser, at demokratiet er det første offer i et kommunistisk samfund.
2. I et kommunistisk samfund opereres kun med de nederste elementer fra Maslows behovspyramide, idetselvrealisering reduceres til altruisme/foræringer til samfundet, idet ingen kan få mere end andre ved at gøre en indsats. Dermed vil samtlige varer i evt. butikker med tiden se mere og mere grå og ensartede ud.
3. Ytringsfrihed rammes hårdt af kommunismen. Da kommunismen ikke har råd til demokrati eller andre samfundsomstyrtende handlinger, vil kommunismen med tiden slå hårdere og hårdere ned på dissidenter og anderledes tænkende. Typisk har kommunismen anvendt arbejdslejre eller dødsstraf eller fængsel på ubestemt tid.
4. Ejendomsretten forsvinder (husk lige tandbørsten) ikke, men overgår til staten. Al menneskelig erfaring viser at magt korrumperer og uindskrænket magt korrumperer totalt. Der vil således opstå en ny elite beståede af partibosser, der uhæmmet nyder de få tilbageværende luksusting. De 10% af danmarks befolkning, der i dag ville stemme på Enhedslisten bliver ikke blandt disse megapampere, idet et ikke-demokratisk land kan styres med meget få i den priviligerede klasse.
5. Retssamfundet holder op med at fungere. Dommere må nødvendigvis smide al tidligere retspraksis ud i et kommunistisk samfund, idet præcedens jo byggede på ejendomsret og øvrige frihedsrettigheder. Den nye kommunistiske retspraksis vil favorisere staten i hidtil uset omfang, idet det manglende demokrati og dermed den manglende 3-deling af magten, gør at dommerne kun har en magt at forholde sig til. (og gør klogt i at huske det)
6. Økonomien går langsomt i stå. Du arbejder nu efterhånden kun under trussel om fængsel eller arbejdslejr, idet manden uden arbejde jo tjener lige så godt som dig.
7. Stikkersamfundet når usete dimensioner. Da det kommunistiske samfund kræver total underkastelse vil der forholdsvis hurtigt udvikle sig et sikkersamfund, hvor alle angiver alle for selv de mindste forseelser. Tilliden til naboen forsvinder og kun den nærmeste familie taler fortsat åbent og ærligt med hinanden.
8. Grænserne lukkes. Det er en naturlig konsekvens af den manglende mulighed for selvrealisering og ytringsfrihed at folk gerne vil væk, altså lukkes grænserne og kun særligt lydige partifolk får lov at rejse ud.
9. Censur bliver et omfattende erhverv. Da ingen må udtale sig negativt om kommunismen bliver der masser af jobs til censur-folket ifht aviser bøger internettet med videre.
10. Livsglæden forsvinder. I et kommunistisk samfund, hvor ytringsfriheden, demokratiet og selvrealisering fornægtes, spreder modløshedes basille sig lynhurtigt til hele befolkningen.

Om at blæse og at have mel i munden - et overset paradoks i kvindekampen


Det stærke køn - kvinderne - har længe kæmpet for positiv særbehandling, således at det kunne være en særlig kvalifikation at være kvinde og dermed komme foran mere kvalificerede fx til en forskerstilling på et universitet. (Kønskvotering hedder positiv særbehandling pt). 


Nu har kvindekampen taget en ny drejning. I Sverige er det blevet populært i børnehaver at anvende en ny form af 3. person ental, nemlig "hen" altså en bevidst kønsløs omtale af en 3. person.http://politiken.dk/kultur/ECE1566463/svenskerne-vil-ikke-laengere-sige-han-eller-hun/

Indtil videre er det ikke nået ind på avisernes stockholm-redaktioner (medmindre, der er en særlig årsag til at anvende udtrykket), men bare rolig, kvinderne plejer jo at få hvad de vil ha. 

Herhjemme har vi set et lignende tiltag fra Sofie Carsten Nielsen, der ønsker sig kønsløse pas: http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Politik/2012/08/09/093332.htm

Min pointe er, - og det kan godt være det er polemisk - men det er svært at tage disse 2 krav seriøst og det er navnligt nærmest umuligt at opfylde dem samtidig.

Hvordan vil det stærke køn fremover have gennemført rækken af positive særbehandlinger samtidig med at enhver form for tiltale og identifikation skal være kønsneutral?

Om hvorfor venstrefløjen aldrig vil undskylde for masseindvandringen


Ganske kort, hvis folket i for store tal kan klare sig selv og har det godt, ja så mangler venstrefløjen afgørende vælgergrundlag. Hva gør man så? Jo, man kan importere klienter, der er så forkomne og svage at de vil elske en stærk stat, der er parat til at sørge for det hele. 

I mine øjne den vigtigste årsag til at Danmark m/mange andre velfungerende vesteuropæiske lande i de sidste 20-30 år er blevet oversvømmet med fattige immigranter.

Venstrefløjen var i alvorlige problemer på grund af succesen fra landenes egne borgere. 

Derudover er masseindvandringen genial til at splitte højrefløjen i de korrekte og resten, der ganske simplet kan gøres ikke-stuerene ved at blive benævnt racister, hvis de ikke klapper tilstrækkeligt i hænderne over dette kollektive nationale selvmordsforsøg. 

Endvidere manglede venstrefløjen et projekt, der kunne svinge dem op på en høj moralsk hest, uden at være afhængig af usikkerheden om grønne visoners vederhæftighed

Venstrefløjen havde ikke gjort sig tanker om de økonomiske implikationer af masseindvandringen, men krydsede blot fingre (svarende til deres generelle økonomisk/politikiske overvejelser). 

Nu hvor samtlige europæiske lande segner under de voldsomme økonomiske omkostninger denne import har medført, får vi så et undskyld?

Det skal du ikke regne med.

Multikultur-projektet har erstattet Poul Nyrup Rasmussens sammenhængskraft, og er venstrefløjens eliteprojekt og gør venstrefløjen til bedre mennesker end andre. Uanset om man tilfældigvis ødelægger en stat eller 10. 

EUs George Orwell projekt - Hva fanden sker der?


EU udgav i går en rapport om ”media-freedom and pluralism” som anbefaler (surprise, surprise) at EU skal være ny øverstbefalende i relation til kontrol med journalister. 5 ting sker, hvis EU lykkes (Gud forbyde det) med dette:

1.  Journalister skal fremover i de groveste tilfælde kunne fratages deres ret til at være journalist samt idømmes bøder eller i mindre grove tilfælde tvinges til at sige undskyld. 
Dvs. betydelig hårdere sanktionering end Danmark anvender i dag, idet pressenævnet ikke fratager journalister deres levebrød og ej heller idømmer bøder. Kun straffesager kan medføre den slags situationer og disse er sjældne.

2. Rapporten anbefaler at en ny institution oprettes, der skal holde øje med alle medier. (Scary) Gad vide hvad det kommer til at koste og hvor mange Stasi-ansatte, der skal være?

3. Journalister skal fremover i alt deres arbejde overholde et nyt kriterium, nemlig at journalister til stadighed skal leve op til EU's værdier, hvad det så end er. De engelske aviser, der er kritiske mod EU kommer helt sikkert i vridemaskinen. Hvem tør herefter kritisere EU? Er helt sikker på at denne artikel ikke lever op til EU's værdier og er stolt af det. Hva fanden sker der? Skal vi alle til stadighed skråle ”ode to joy”? LÆS til eks. bare en enkelt af EUs egne rapporter og se hvordan EU selv ”journalistisk” arbejder og se hvilken forherligelse journalisterne der tildeler EU.

4. Staten skal støtte medier ”whereever” markedet fejler. Glem at tro, at EU anerkender og tror på markedet. EU tror på EU og nix wieders. (Bortset fra statsstøtte for det kan skimmes). 

5. Det anbefales at blogosfæren undergives samme retningslinier og at der skal oprettes en hemmelig database med oversigt over alle journalist-lignende bloggere – s. 8 – (motto: vi ved hvem du er) 

Bortset fra disse 5 ret uhyggelige tiltag indeholder rapporten intet godt, som det danske pressenævn og retssystem ikke kan i forvejen.

Velkommen til den nye EU overvågede virkelighed. 

George Orwell (1984) virker mere og mere fantasiløs ifht dagens EU. Pudsigt at det i går faktisk var den årligeGeorge Orwell-dag! Coincidence?

EDIT: Følgende medier støtter op om kritikken: JournalistenTelegraphThe Independent, og en lang, lang række blogs. Godt Journalisten i Danmark er så hurtig. 

Gi din stemme til kende, sig NEJ: http://www.skrivunder.net/helt_ud_nu

1 February 2013

Moderaterna strammer indvandringspolitiken efter vælgerflugt til SD


Sverigedemokraterna välkomnar det uppvaknande avseende asyl- och anhöriginvanringen som migrationsminister Tobias Billström idag ger uttryck för i en artikel i Dagens Nyheter. 
Det är mycket glädjande om moderaterna börjar lyssna på Sverigedemokraterna och tar ansvar för den akuta situation man tillsammans med såväl resten av alliansen som med det rödgröna blocket har ställt till med.
En sak är tydlig, Sverigedemokraterna påverkar debatten i rätt riktning.

Radigale Liv Holm Andersen: Vi har omgjort udlændingepolitikken, men har ikke lempet asylområdet


Foranlediget af Søren Espersens blogpost om RAF-regeringens udlændingepolitiske lempelser, kontaktede en bekendt kort før jul Liv Holm Andersen, integrationsordfører for Det Radikale Venstre. “Prøv at læse denne artikel, og sig så, at der ikke er ændret èn eneste asylregel.”, skrev MH, hvortil hun svarede ad to omgange: “regeringen (har) faktisk IKKE lempet én eneste asylregel….!” (20. december 2012) og “det er der altså ikke” (22. december 2012).
MH var ikke helt tilfreds med svaret, og gik videre med sagen. Svaret var entydigt: “Reglerne for at få asyl i Danmark er UÆNDRET”.

I mandags offentliggjorde Liv Holm Andersen en yderst afslørende blogpost på Radikale.dk, hvori hun pralede med regeringens mange udlændingepolitiske ‘initiativer’, der har gjort at Danmark efter hendes mening “ikke længere fører ‘verdens strammeste udlændingepolitik’”.